Ida Bagus Narmada, - and Amalina Indah Cynthia, - and Ari Triwardhani, - (2019) A Comparison of Antibacterial Inhibitory Effect on Streptococcus mutans and Tensile Strength between chitosan‑Based Bonding Adhesives and Commercial Products. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 30 (4). pp. 553-557. ISSN 19983603

	Text (ARTIKEL) A Comparison of Antibacterial Inhibitory Effect.pdf Download (6MB)
	Text (SIMILARITY) 5. A Comparison of Antibacterial Inhibitory Effect on Streptococcus mutans and Tensile Strength between Chitosan-Based Bonding Adhesives and Commercial Products (2).pdf Download (2MB)
	Text (PEER REVIEW) Dr.Ari 5.pdf Download (897kB)
	Text (VALIDASI) 5. Comparison Of Antibacterial.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (KARIL) 5.Kualitas Karil dan Kesesuaian Bidang Ilmu-Ari5.pdf Download (817kB)

Abstract

Background: Adhesive bonding is the material used to attach a bracket to the enamel surface of the tooth. Streptococcus mutans contributes to enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment. Objectives: To analyze the antimicrobial inhibitory effect of Streptococcus mutans bacteria and tensile strength of chitosan and CaCO3‑based adhesive bonding material. Materials and Methods: The investigation constituted laboratory experimental research featuring analytical observation and a random sampling method. The antibacterial inhibitory effect of chitosan and CaCO3‑based adhesive bonding against Streptococcus mutans involved six groups: two control groups using commercial light cure and self‑cure adhesive bonding products and four groups using adhesive bonding consisting of 75% CaCO3 + 17.6% Bis‑GMA + 22.4% MMA with various percentages of chitosan composition (A1: 25%, A2: 50%, A3: 75%, and A4: 100%) each group consisting of two samples (n = 12). A diametric test was conducted consisting of three samples (n = 15) to measure the tensile strength of each group. Data were analyzed by a combination of one‑way analysis of variance and least significant difference tests. Result: The antibacterial inhibitory effect showed significant differences between groups (A1: 2.9467 ± 0.4163, A2: 3.6500 ± 0.6245, A3: 5.1267 ± 0.2517, A4: 4.7267 ± 0.9238; P = 0.0000; P < 0.05). A diametric tensile strength test confirmed significant differences between groups (A1: 7.2733 ± 5.0046, A2: 6.7667 ± 4.4346, A3: 6.4533 ± 2.9994, A4: 1.0058 ± 1.0058, K1: 15.6167 ± 3.1250; P = 0.009; P < 0.05). Conclusion: Chitosan‑based adhesive bonding with good tensile strength has an antibacterial inhibitory effect against Streptococcus mutans.

Actions (login required)

View Item