KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MERUPAKAN PERBUATAN HUKUM PERDATA BERDASARKAN KETENTUAN PASAL 2 BUTIR a UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1986 JUNCTO UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1986 TENTANG PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA

KAMARULLAH, 090515706 D (2008) KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MERUPAKAN PERBUATAN HUKUM PERDATA BERDASARKAN KETENTUAN PASAL 2 BUTIR a UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1986 JUNCTO UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1986 TENTANG PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA. Disertasi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

[img]
Preview
Text (ABSTRAK)
A1KAM.pdf

Download (385kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (FULLTEXT)
F6.pdf

Download (2MB) | Preview
Official URL: http://lib.unair.ac.id

Abstract

Several legal issues are reviewed in this dissertation, as the following, (1) the characteristic of state administrative decision, which is considered as a civil action, (2) state administrative disputes which are in cooperated into a civil action. This research is applying a normative approach, therefore statute approach, conceptual approach, as well as case approach are used in this methods. Some characteristic differences between agreements of public and private (civil) law are found in this Research, which are from the views of authority and its binding decision. The fundamental of Public Law is authority. Thus authority represents the use of State Power. The binding decision of public action is binding to all the people. On the other hand, the fundamental of a civil action is the legal competency which derived from the legal subject (person or legal entity). The civil action therefore is binding only to the parties involved. The state administrative disputes which are in cooperated into a civil action by General Court is against the principles of State Administrative Court which related to basic reviews or any reason to sue (Article 53 section (1) and section (2), Law number 5 of 1986 jo. Law number 9 of 2004 and dispute matters). Furthermore, the above dispute will not be not settled by any administrative law judges, as in General Court there are only judges for criminal and civil law. This dissertation gives an input, that it is time to form the State Administrative Court in general, which are able to settle any state administrative disputes including but not limited to the state administrative decision which is considered as a civil action. Thereby, several amendments are needed in Law number 5 of 1986 jo. Law number 9 of 2004 concerning amendment to Law number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administration Judicature in particular the administration decision which is considered as a civil action, shall extend the competence of State Administration Judicature.

Item Type: Thesis (Disertasi)
Additional Information: KKB KK-2 Dis H 11/08 Kam k
Uncontrolled Keywords: State Administrative Decision; Civil Action; Characteristic of Public and Private Law; Dispute matter and the settlement body
Subjects: K Law > KB Religious law in general > KB1-4855 Religious law in general. Comparative religious law. Jurisprudence > KB400-4855 Interdisciplinary discussion of subjects > KB2101-2862 Constitutions and religion. Constitutional and administrative law
K Law > KZ Law of Nations
Divisions: 09. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana > Ilmu Hukum
Creators:
CreatorsNIM/NIDN
KAMARULLAH, 090515706 DUNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIDN/NIDK/NUP
ContributorPhilipus Mandiri Hadjon, -UNSPECIFIED
ContributorTatiek Sri Djatmiati, -UNSPECIFIED
Depositing User: Tn Joko Iskandar
Date Deposited: 30 Sep 2016 15:54
Last Modified: 05 Jul 2017 18:56
URI: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/32494
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item