PRINSIP RULE OF REASON DALAM HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA

TYAS TRI ARSOYO, 090114326 (2004) PRINSIP RULE OF REASON DALAM HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA. Thesis thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

[img]
Preview
Text (ABSTRAK)
gdlhub-gdl-s2-2006-arsoyotyas-590-th_09-05 ABSTRAK.pdf

Download (310kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Fulltext)
35678.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: http://lib.unair.ac.id

Abstract

The legality of an agreement or regulation can not be determined by so simple a test, as whether it restrains competition. The true test of legality is whether the restraint imposed is such as merely regulates and perhaps thereby promotes competition or whether it is such as may suppressor even destroy competition. The analysis approach of Antitrust Law is per se illegal or rule of reason. One question the courts must address is whether, as a matter of policy, a certain business practice will be held to be per se illegal or wether a rule of reason approach can be applied. The per se illegal approach means that a certain type of business agreement, arrangement, or activity will automatically be held to be illegal by the courts. The agreement, arrangement, or activity is per se illegal because the courts believe that its use by a business will always result in a substantial restrain of trade. The rule of reason approach means that the courts will look at the facts surrounding an agreement, arrangement, or other restraint before deciding whether it helps or hurts competition. In reaching its decision, the courts will consider such factors as the history of restraint, the business reasons behind the restraint, the restraining business's position in its industry, and the structure of industry. The Act of The Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1999 adopted Antitrust Law and this rule of reason approach. The potential for conflicts inherent in rule of reason approach were to formulate criterias of rule of reason. There is no doubt that there is currently a great deal of confusion surrounding the issue of criterias of rule of reason. In this confusion there are a number of fundamental issues that have to be resolved, "which criterias of rule of reason apply?", "what is the meaning of rule of reason in the Act of The Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1999?".

Item Type: Thesis (Thesis)
Additional Information: KKB KK-2 TH 09/05 Ars p
Uncontrolled Keywords: Antitrust Law, Rule of Reason Approach, Criteria of Rule of Reason.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General) > K1-7720 Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
Divisions: 09. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana > Ilmu Hukum
Creators:
CreatorsNIM/NIDN
TYAS TRI ARSOYO, 090114326UNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIDN/NIDK/NUP
ContributorPeter Mahmud Marzuki, Dr. SH., MS.,LLM.UNSPECIFIED
Depositing User: Nn Aimmatul Mukaromah
Date Deposited: 2016
Last Modified: 19 Jun 2017 21:01
URI: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/35678
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item