PERBEDAAN TINGKAT ADHESI INTRAPERITONEUM PASCA REKONSTRUKSI DEFEK DINDING ABDOMEN ANTARA PENGGUNAAN PEDIKEL OMENTUM FLAPPOLYPROPYLENE MESH DAN PHYSIOMESH (STUDI EKSPERIMENTAL PADA HEWAN COBA TIKUS WISTAR)

M. Farizka Firdaus, dr (2015) PERBEDAAN TINGKAT ADHESI INTRAPERITONEUM PASCA REKONSTRUKSI DEFEK DINDING ABDOMEN ANTARA PENGGUNAAN PEDIKEL OMENTUM FLAPPOLYPROPYLENE MESH DAN PHYSIOMESH (STUDI EKSPERIMENTAL PADA HEWAN COBA TIKUS WISTAR). Thesis thesis, Universitas Airlangga.

[img]
Preview
Text (abstrak)
PPDS. IB. 06-16 Fir p abstrak.pdf

Download (391kB) | Preview
[img] Text (FULLTEXT)
56995.compressed.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
Official URL: http://lib.unair.ac.id

Abstract

Comparison of Intraperitoneal Adhesion Level Post-Repair Abdominal Wall Defect Resulted From Pedicle Omental Flap-Polypropylene Mesh and Physiomesh  in Wistar Rats M. Farizka Firdaus*, Iskandar Ali**, Alphania Rahniayu** *General Surgery Residency Programme, Airlangga University – Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya **Digestive Surgery Div, Department of Surgery, Airlangga University –Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya **Pathological Anatomy Div, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Airlangga University –Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya Abstract Background. Abdominal wall defect are often complex not amenable to primary closure. The primary objectives of abdominal wall reconstructions are to protect abdominal contents and provide functional support. Intraperitoneal onlay Polypropylene mesh (PPM) singly repair for abdominal defect has many potential risks, including adhesion that cause intestinal obstruction, fistula formation, thus increasing morbidity and cost of care. Physiomesh, one of mechanical prosthetic, has been tested as an antiadherent intraperitoneal layer in animal with excellent and promising outcomes; however, it is expensive to store and remains problems in Indonesia. In contrast, Omentum flap is biological material option with cost-effective and good availability in combination with PPM to achieve the objectives of reconstruction. Purpose. The aim was to compare the degrees of intraperitoneal adhesions between combination Pedicle Omentum Flap-PPM and physiomesh. Method. This prospective, randomized post-test only control group trial was done in wistar rats. Thirty-six rats were randomized into two groups. In the first group, Pedicle Omentum flap and polypropylene mesh were placed in intraabdominal space. In the second, physiomeshes were used. Adhesions were assessed macroscopically, while the portion of the abdominal wall was then resected for histological testing. Results. No significant difference between two groups In Microscopically. An average score of intraperitoneal adhesions was significantly lower in the group with Omentum Flap-polypropylene mesh compared with Physiomesh In Macroscopically Conclusions. Used of Omentum Flap -polypropylene mesh and Physiomesh as a physical barrier to lower the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions after laparotomy in rats votes by Federer macroscopic adhesion and proven scoring system significantly microscopically. There is significant difference of the level of intraperitoneal adhesions, better in Omental grup, making use Omentum flap-Polypropylene mesh prosthesis can be considered as an alternative in the reconstruction of the abdominal wall through advanced clinical research. Keywords : Intraperitoneal adhesion, Pedicle Omental flap-polypropylene mesh, Physiomesh

Item Type: Thesis (Thesis)
Additional Information: KKA KK PPDS. IB. 06-16 Fir p
Uncontrolled Keywords: Intraperitoneal adhesion, Pedicle Omental flap-polypropylene mesh, Physiomesh
Subjects: R Medicine > RD Surgery > RD520-599.5 Surgery by region, system, or organ
Divisions: 01. Fakultas Kedokteran > Ilmu Bedah Umum
Creators:
CreatorsEmail
M. Farizka Firdaus, drUNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionNameEmail
ContributorIskandar Ali, dr. Sp.B(K)OnkUNSPECIFIED
ContributorAlphania Rahniayu, dr. Sp.PAUNSPECIFIED
Depositing User: Tatik Poedjijarti
Date Deposited: 02 May 2017 00:50
Last Modified: 05 Jul 2017 15:35
URI: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/56995
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item