Audi Naura Dhaneswara (2020) Urgensi Pengaturan Sistem Pre-Notifikasi Merger Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat Di Indonesia. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

	Text (HALAMAN JUDUL) 1. HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Download (372kB)
	Text (ABSTRAK) 2. ASBTRAK.pdf Download (90kB)
	Text (DAFTAR ISI) 3. DAFTAR ISI.pdf Download (156kB)
	Text (BAB I) 4. BAB I PENDAHULUAN.pdf Download (209kB)
	Text (BAB II) 5. BAB II KONSEP MERGER, AKUISISI, DAN KONSOLIDASI DALAMPERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 26 February 2024. Download (382kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB III) 6. BAB III URGENSI PERUBAHAN SISTEM NOTIFIKASI MERGER, AKUISISI,DAN KONSOLIDASI DI INDONESIA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 26 February 2024. Download (448kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB IV) 7. BAB IV PENUTUP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 26 February 2024. Download (94kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR BACAAN) 8. DAFTAR BACAAN.pdf Download (170kB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) 9. LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 26 February 2024. Download (5MB) | Request a copy
	Text (PERNYATAAN KESEDIAAN PUBLIKASI) 10. PERNYATAAN KESEDIAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (192kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Globalization and the industrial revolution have encouraged the emergence of various business actors with innovative and adaptive business schemes tailored to the needs and developments of the times which have caused the climate of business competition in Indonesia to be tighter. In order for business actors to compete and maintain their business in the market, many business actors carry out mergers, acquisitions and consolidations. Business actors conducting merger, acquisition and consolidation transactions that meet certain requirements are required to notify KPPU no later than 30 (thirty) days after the transaction becomes juridically effective or known as the post-merger notification system. The post-merger notification system that has been adopted by Indonesia for 21 years since it was first regulated in Law No. 5 of 1999 is considered no longer in accordance with current situation. This research was conducted with the aim of analyzing the urgency of changing the provisions of the post-merger notification system by comparing the pre-merger notification systems adopted by the United States and the Philippines. 1. Ali, Zainuddin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016. 2. Black, Henry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition, West Publishing Co., Minnesota, 1990. 3. Boone, Louis, Contemporary Business (Pengantar Bisnis Kontemporer), Salemba Empat, Jakarta, 2007. 4. Budiyono, Tri, Hukum Perusahaan, Griya Media, Salatiga, 2011. Emirzon, Joni, Hukum Bisnis Indonesia, Prenhalindo, Jakarta, 2000. 5. Fuady, Munir, Hukum tentang Merger, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2008. 6. Gaughan, Patrick A., Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate Restructurings, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2007. 7. Gavil, Andrew, Antitrust Law in Perspective: Cases, Concepts, and Problems in Competition Policy, West Group, St. Paul, 2002. 8. Hermansyah, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia, Kencana, 2009 9. Kagramanto, Budi, Mengenal Hukum Persaingan Usaha Berdasarkan UU No. 5 Tahun 1999, edisi revisi, Penerbit Laros, Sidoarjo, 2012. 10. Kusumawati, Lanny, Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Laros, Sidoarjo, 2007 11. Lubis, Andi Fahmi, Edisi Kedua Buku Teks Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU), 2017. 12. Lubis, Andi Fahmi, Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Antara Teks dan Konteks, ROV Creative Media, Jakarta, 2009. 13. Maarif, Syamsul, Merger dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Degraf Publishing, Jakarta, 2010. 14. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum edisi revisi, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2005. 15. Nelson, Ralph. L., Merger Movement in America Industry, 1895 – 1956, Princeton University Press, 1959. 16. Nugroho, Susanti Adi, Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2012. 17. Setyawati, Ria, Ex Ante dalam European Union Merger Control (Sebuah Perbadingan dengan Pengendalian Pengggabungan, Peleburan dan Pengambilalihan dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia), PT Revka Petra Medi, Surabaya, 2013. 18. Soekanto, Soerjono, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2001. 19. Tarigan, Joshua, Merger dan Akuisisi: dari Perspektif Strategis dan Kondisi Indonesia (Pendekatan Konsep dan Studi Kasus), Ekuilibria, Yogyakarta, 2016. 20. Werden, Gregory J., Luke M. Froeb, Handbook of Antitrust Economics, MIT Press, 2005. 21. Aigner, Gisela, “The Analysis of Coordinated Effects in EU Merger Control: Where Do We Stand After Sony/BMG and Impala?”, Marburger Volkswirtschaftliche Beiträge, 2016. 22. Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri, “Pengendalian Merger Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Merger Control Based on Competition Law)”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 10 No. 02, 2013. 23. Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri, “Penerapan Sistem Notifikasi Post-Merger atas Pengambilalihan Saham Perusahaan Berdasrkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Law Pro Justitia, Vol 1. No.1, Desember 2015. 24. Bliss, Robert, “Market Discipline in Financial Markets: Theory, Evidence, and Obstacles”, Oxford Handbooks Online, 2015. 25. Center for Competition Law Studies, “The Analytical Framework for Merger Control”, CEDEC Publication, 2002 26. Coates IV, John C., ‘Mergers, Acquisitions and Restructuring: Types, Regulation, and Patterns of Practice’, Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper, Series Discussion Paper No. 781, 2014. 27. Cosnita, Andrea, “Ex Post or Ex Ante? On the Optimal Timing of Merger Control”, EconomiX Working Paper, 2013. 28. Fabra, Natalia, "Coordinated Effects in Merger Cases", CRC America Latina, 2013. 29. Fox, Eleanor M., “What is Harm to Competition? Exclusionary Practices and Anticompetitive Effect”, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 70 No.2, 2002. 30. Gelfand, David, “Be Careful What You Wish for: U.S Government Enforcement of Merger Consent Decrees”, The Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 58 No. 2, 2013. 31. Glassie, Jefferson C., “Summary of Legal Aspects of Mergers, Consolidations, and Transfers of Assets”, Association Law & Policy, 2008. 32. Hosken, Daniel, “Ex Post Merger Evaluation: How Does It Help Ex Ante?”, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2016. 33. Ivaldi, Marc, “The Economics of Tacit Collusion”, Final Report for DG Competition European Commission, 2003. 34. Kustanto, Anto, “Upaya Perusahaan dalam Menempuh Efisiensi dan Kinerja Melalui Merger, Akuisisi, Konsolidasi, dan Pemisahan”, Jurnal Imiliah Ilmu Hukum QISTIE, Vol. 11 No. 1, 2018. 35. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, “PP No. 57 Tahun 2010 dari Sudut Pandang Konseptor”, Kompetisi, Edisi 24, 2010. 36. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, “Menelisik Peran KPPU dalam Pengawasan Merger dan Akuisisi”, Kompetisi, Edisi 63, 2019. 37. Nugraha, Xavier, “Urgensi Notifikasi Pratransaksi 3P (Penggabungan, Peleburan, Pengambilalihan) Upaya Preventif Persaingan Usaha”, Legislatif, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2019. 38. Paparang, Joshua Anggelito, “Tugas dan Wewenang Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran Hukum Persaingan Usaha menurut Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999”, Lex Privatum, Vol. VIII No. 7, 2019. 39. Prasetyo, David, “Peralihan Pemegang Hak Tanggungan atas Akuisisi Perusahaan Terbatas”, Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, Vol. 27 No. 2, 2018. 40. Ruane, Kathleen Ann, “Pre-Merger Review and Challenges Under the Clayton Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act”, Congressional Research Service, 2017. 41. Ruslim, Herman, “Merger, Akuisisi dan Restrukturisasi”, Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis, Vol 3. No. 1, 2008. 42. Salop, Steven. C, “Exclusionary Conduct, Effect on Consumers, and the Flawed Profit-Sacrifice Standard”, Georgetown Law Faculty Publication, 2006. 43. Soemardi, Tresna Priyana, “Pengadalian Praktik Merger dan Akuisisi dalam Kegiatan Usaha di Indonesia: Menuju Kegiatan Usaha yang Bersih dari Perilaku Anti Persaingan dan Praktik Monopoli”, Untaian Pemikiran Sewindu Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, 2007. 44. Soundarya, M. Baby, “Merger and Acquisition of Business Organization and its Impact on Human Resources”, Journal of Business Strategy, Finance and Management, Vol 1 No. 1, 2018. 45. Sudjana, “Merger dalam Perspektif Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Berdasarkan UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999”, Jurnal Hukum POSITUM, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2016. 46. Tamosiuniene, Rima, “The Importance of Mergers and Acquisition in Today’s Economy”, 2009. 47. Qaqaya, Hasan, “The Effects of Anti-Competitive Business Practices on Developing Countries and Their Development Prospects”, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2008. 48. Wafiya, “Politik Hukum Pembentukan Undang-Undang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat”, Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 8 No. 4, 2014. 49. Atika Suri, Fadhilah, Pengaturan Post Notifikasi dalam Penggabungan Usaha (Merger) sebagai Upaya Mencegah Persaingan Usaha yang Tidak Sehat, Skripsi pada Program Sarjana Universitas Jember, Jember, 2019. 50. Hasibuan, Ardian Mahmud, Pengawasan Merger oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Kota Batam, Skripsi pada Program Sarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Riau, 2016. 51. Nasution, Azhar Rasyid, Analisa Yuridis Kewenagan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Menjatuhkan Sanksi Administratif (Studi Kasus: Putusan KPPU No. 1/KPPU-L/2013), Skripsi pada Program Sarjana Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2015. 52. Nugrahaningsih, Syarifah, Pengambilalihan Aset dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Skripsi pada Program Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 2018. 53. Purwanti, Iga, Metode Ex-Ante Pengendalian Penggabungan, Peleburan, dan Pengambilalihan Perusahaan dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Skripsi pada Program Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, 2013. 54. Kriekhoff, Valerine J.L., Metode Penelitian Hukum, Program Pasca Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2005. 55. Monica, Sonya, Implementasi Ketentuan Notifikasi Penggabungan, Peleburan, dan Pengambilalihan Badan Usaha dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Tesis pada program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2012. 56. ASEAN Secretariat, Handbook on Competition Policy and Law in ASEAN for Business 2017, 2017. 57. Antitrust Division of US Department of Justice, Merger Remedies Manual, 2020. Federal Trade Commission Premerger Notification Office, Introductory Guide I, what is the Premerger Notification Program? An Overview, 2009 58. Federal Trade Commission Premerger Notification Office, Introductory Guide II, To File or Not to File: When You Must File a Premerger Notification Report Form, 2008. 59. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, Pedoman Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 57 Tahun 2010, 2010. 60. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, Pedoman Program Kepatuhan terhadap Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999, 2016. 61. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, Pedoman Penilaian terhadap Penggabungan, Peleburan, atau Pengambilalihan, 2020. 62. Laporan Tahunan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, 2019. 63. Naskah Akademik Rancangan Amandemen Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. 64. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Challenges in the Design of Merger Control Regime for Young and Small Competition Authorities, 2017. 65. US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 2010. 66. Philippine Competition Commission, Merger Review Guidelines, 2016. 67. Artha, Mutiara Putri, “Pembatalan Merger”, Hukumonline, 27 Desember 2010, dalam https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt4d093b3ba6c8f/pembat alan-merger diakses pada 3 Desember 2020. 68. Avilliani, “Independensi KPPU dalam Mengontrol Monopoli Usaha”, 16 Juni 2017, dalam https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-3533304/independensi-kppu-dalam- mengontrol-monopoli-usaha diakses pada 5 September 2020. 69. Coloma, Jeremy. S, https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/philippines- mergers-acquisitions/ diakses pada 12 November 2020. 70. Dewi, Chandrawati, “Merger Control 2020: Indonesia”, 13 Juli 2020, dalam https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/merger-control- 2020/indonesia diakses pada 13 Oktober 2020. 71. Federal Trade Commission, https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press- releases/2020/01/ftc-publishes-inflation-adjusted-civil-penalty-amounts diakses pada 12 November 2020. 72. Kertesz, Anna, “United States: Merger Control”, 2019, dalam https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/united-states-merger-control/ diakses pada 8 November 2020. 73. Komisi VI Dewan Perwakilan Raykat Republik Indonesia (DPR RI), “Komisi VI Dorong UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 Masuk Prolegnas”, dalam http://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/26546/t/Komisi+VI+Dorong+UU+No mor+5+Tahun+1999+Masuk+Prolegnas diakses pada 6 Desember 2020. 74. Luenendonk, Martin, “Merger Regulation”, 13 Agustus 2016, www.cleverism.com diakses pada tanggal 30 September 2020. 75. Federal Trade Commission, https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/media- resources/mergers-and-competition/merger-review diakses pada 11 November 2020. 76. Mucchetti, Peter, “Merger Control in the United States: Overview”, 1 Juni 2020, dalam https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-501-2849?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true diakses pada 8 November 2020. 77. Rizky, M. Januar, “Wacana Pre-Merger Notification Menguat dalam Revisi UU Persaingan Usaha”, Hukumonline, 14 Februari 2019, dalam https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5c6537e35bf17/wacana-i-pre- merger-notification-i-menguat-dalam-revisi-uu-persaingan-usaha diakses pada 3 Desember 2020. 78. Sugiarto, Eddy Cahyono, “Ekonomi Kreatif Masa Depan Indonesia”, 13 November 2018, dalam 79. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/ekonomi_kreatif_masa_depan_indones ia diakses pada 5 September 2020. 80. The Office of the Historian and the Clerk of the House’s Office of Art and Archives US House of Representatives, https://history.house.gov/HistoricalHighlight/Detail/15032424979 diakses pada 8 November 2020

Actions (login required)

View Item