Poverty Dynamics in Indonesia : Empirical Evidence from Three Main Approaches

Rudi Purwono, Dr and Wahyu Wisnu Wardana, - and Tri Haryanto, Ph.D. and M. Khoerul Mubin, - (2021) Poverty Dynamics in Indonesia : Empirical Evidence from Three Main Approaches. World Development Perspectives, 23. pp. 1-9. ISSN 2452-2929

[img] Text (Artikel)
Rudi P_ Artikel101_Poverty dynamics.pdf

Download (1MB)
[img] Text (Pee Review)
Rudi Purwono_Peer Review101.pdf

Download (1MB)
[img] Text (Similarity Test)
Rudi P_ Similarity101-Poverty dynamics.pdf

Download (3MB)
[img] Text (Corresponding Author)
Rudi Purwono_Korespondensi101_Poverty dynamics.pdf

Download (2MB)
[img] Text (Syarat Tamabahan 1)
Rudi P_Syarat Tambahan1_pembimbing S3.pdf

Download (1MB)
[img] Text (Syarat Tambahan 2)
Rudi P_Syarat Tambahan2_Penguji S3.pdf

Download (3MB)
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/world-develo...

Abstract

Although the number of studies on poverty dynamics in Indonesia is growing, the findings remain inconclusive. This study aims to reexamine the poverty dynamics in Indonesia by using three main approaches: the spell approach, the component approach, and the equally distributed equivalent (EDE) poverty gap approach. The study employed household panel data from the National Socio-Economic Survey of Indonesia (Susenas) 2008 and 2010 and also the FGT index. The analysis shows that the spell approach tends to underestimate chronic poverty (households remain poor in two consecutive periods of observations). It estimates that 6.7% of the total households experienced chronic poverty. Meanwhile, the conclusion of poverty dynamics under the component approach is sensitive to the choice of poverty parameter of the FGT index. By employing the poverty parameter of α = 0, around 11.07% of total households were classified as chronically poor (average expenditure below the poverty lines). However, applying the poverty gap (α = 1) and poverty severity (α = 2) indicates that the chronic component reached 63.16% and 54.15% of the total poverty, respectively. Likewise, the EDE poverty gap approach also suggests that poverty in Indonesia is mainly chronic at 92% of the total component of poverty. The high percentage of chronic poverty is contributed by the significant cost of inequality.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Poverty dynamics, Chronic poverty, Transient poverty, Poverty alleviation, Inequality, Indonesia
Subjects: H Social Sciences
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: 04. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis > Ekonomi Pembangunan
Creators:
CreatorsNIM
Rudi Purwono, DrUNSPECIFIED
Wahyu Wisnu Wardana, -UNSPECIFIED
Tri Haryanto, Ph.D.UNSPECIFIED
M. Khoerul Mubin, -UNSPECIFIED
Depositing User: Tn Sugeng Riyanto
Date Deposited: 04 Mar 2022 02:30
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2022 02:30
URI: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/113917
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item