Maretha Siwinata, - and Nanik Zubaidah, - and Adioro Soetojo, - (2020) The effectivity of cavity cleanser chlorhexidine gluconate 2% and saponin 0.78% of mangosteen peel. Conservative Dentistry Journal, 10 (1). pp. 19-22. ISSN 2087-1848

	Text (ARTIKEL) 18. effectivity.pdf Download (438kB)
	Text (TURNITIN) 18. TheEffectivity.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (VALIDASI KARIL) 18. Effectivity.pdf Download (3MB)

Abstract

Background: Use of cavity cleanser is important before restoration the teeth to clean debris, residue of prepared dentine, blood, bacteria, collagen denaturized by teeth preparation. Nowadays, the cavity cleanser that people used still having shortcoming, one of which is the lack of ability to clean the root canal of the smear layer. Purpose: The purpose of this study examines the difference of cavity cleaner between saponin of mangosteen peel (Garcinia Mangostana L.) and chlorhexidine gluconate 2%. Methods: Eighteen upper first premolar divided into 3 groups, each of them consist three tooth. Forming the preparation tooth cavity then group 1 using aquadest for control group, group 2 using chlorhexidine gluconate 2%, and group 3 using saponin of mangosteen peel (Garcinia Mangostana L.). For rating cleanliness of the tooth cavity using a scale of cleanliness conducted under Scanning Electron Microscope. Results: There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in One-Way ANOVA parametric test and pos hoc test between chlorhexidine gluconate 2 % and saponin of mangosteen peel to the cleanliness of the tooth cavity. Conclusion: According to the result of the study, it can be concluded that saponin of mangosteen peel (Garcinia Mangostana L.) less effective for cleaning the tooth cavity than chlorhexidine gluconate 2%.

Actions (login required)

View Item