Dendhy Dwi Handana Sagita, - (2024) Perbedaan Metode Permainan Monopol Sex Educator Dengan Focus Group Discussion Terhadap Peningkatan Pengetahuan Siswa Tentang IMS (Infeksi Menular Seksual) Di SMA 1 Tuban Penelitian Quast' Experiment. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

Text dendhy dwi handana sagita20240306_09214163.pdf Download (5MB)

Abstract

Few young people receive adequate preparation for their sexual lives because of disapproval of open discussion of sexual matters by adults., including parents and teachers, at the very time when it was most needed. This leaves them potentially vulnerable sexually transmitted diseases (STDs ). The key of this problem was increasingly signalling the importance of equipping young people with knowledge and skills to make responsible choices in their lives. Methodes of sexual health education, Monopol sex educator and Focus group Discussion, was being used on a real health promotion and being compared to know the difference between two of them. Quasy experiment design was used in this study. The population of this research was students years 2011-2012 in SMA I Tuban. Samples taken by purposive sampling up to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were collected by questionnaire. The data analyzed by Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test and Mann Whitney U Test. Result Qf research showed that MSE has influence to increase teenage knowledge with significancy p=O,O 14 but FGD doesn't has influence with p=0,096. And to know about the difference about MSE !!ml fOR with p=Q,22Q, 4i4 ~wt 4i:ff~r~n~~ P~tw~~n ho.th of th~m, C.9n~ll!4~<1~ there is no differences between MSE and FGD and both of them can be used to increase teenage knowledge of STD' s. Facilitator must prepare his ability on MSE and control the situation . In the next time, MSE is need to be used in many health education activity . So, the result pre and post test of MSE can be used in FGD activity.

Actions (login required)

View Item