ANDITA WIDYA MAHARANI, 02
(2014)
PERBEDAAN BAHAN EKSTRAK PROPOLIS 8% DAN EDTA 17% TERHADAP KEBERSIHAN DINDING SALURAN AKAR: PENELITIAN EKSPERIMENTAL LABORATORIS.
Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.
Full text not available from this repository.
(
Request a copy)
Abstract
Root canal instrumentation produces a smear layer that covers the
surfaces of prepared canal walls. Smear layer is a debris consisting organic and
inorganic particles that has to be removed for success of endodontic treatment.
Propolis, natural product of the honeybee contain saponin compounds that are as
surfactants which can dissolve the smear layer. 17% EDTA has been used for
irrigations solutions that can remove the inorganic particle of smear layer. Until
now the research about the difference cleanliness between Propolis extract and
17% EDTA still has not been done. Purpose. This study was to carry out SEM
analysis of the cleanliness of root canal walls, irrigated with aquadest, 8%
Propolis extract and 17% EDTA. Method. Twenty one extracted teeth with
straight single root canals were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=7). The
specimens instrumented with Protaper for Hand Use up to F3. During
instrumentations, irrigations were made with the different solutions: Control
Group: aquadest; Group 1: 8% Propolis extract; Group 2: 17% EDTA. After that,
the roots were cut for SEM analysis, at apical thirds, to ascertain the cleanliness
of root canal walls. SEM scores were submitted to Mann Whitney test at the significance level of p=5%, and Median Control Test. Results. For Mann-Whitney test there were significant differences between each group (p<0,05). Median
value of 8% Propolis extract shown 1,000 which is the smallest value compared to the value of the other groups. Conclusion. Propolis extract better in cleaning the root canal walls compared with EDTA 17%
Tidak Ada File
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
