SYAIFUL MA’ARIF, 031170150 (2017) PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERKAIT KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM UPAYA HUKUM KASASI ATAS PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA PIDANA. Disertasi thesis, Universitas Airlangga.
|
Text (ABSTRACT)
DIS.H.14-17 Ma'a p ABSTRAK.pdf Download (640kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](https://repository.unair.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (FULLTEXT)
DIS.H.14-17 Ma'a p DISERTASI.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 31 October 2020. Download (2MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
This dissertation entitled "The Constitutional Court Related Authority of the Supreme Court of Cassation In Acquittal on Criminal Case" The research in this dissertation concern the practice article 244 the Law of Criminal Procedure, Decree of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M. 14- PW.07.03 dated December 10th 1983, jurisprudence, and the Constitutional Court decision No. 114/PUU-X/2012 dated March 26th 2013 raised legal issues regarding the philosophical basis of the authority of the Supreme Court, setting cassation against the acquittal of criminal case and the acquittal impact in the law of criminal procedure againts existence of the Supreme constitution verdict No: 114 / PUU-X / 2012 dated March 26th 2013. Approach used is normative research methods to approach law (Statute approach), Conceptual approach (Conseptual approach), and the approach to the case (case approach). This research concluded that acquittal is the protection of the rights of suspects / defendants as subjects not an objects that need to be protected reffered to Pancasila point 2, article 28 D paragraph (1) Constitution of Republic Indonesia and article 95 paragraph (1) and artickle 97 Paragraph (1) the Law of Criminal Procedure. Sothe acquittal need to be maintained and raised in Amendment Act No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure.There is a conflict of norm or contradictory in cassation on the acquittal in the Supreme Court Act between Article 30 appropriate with article 253 paragraph (1) the Law of Criminal Procedure with article 50 paragraph (2) and article 52 Supreme Court Act, so its appropriate if changes rule in the Supreme Court Actby deleting Article 50 paragraph (2) and Article 52 the Supreme Court Act.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Disertasi) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additional Information: | KKB KK DIS.H.14/17 Ma'a p | ||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) > K1-7720 Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > K(520)-5582 Comparative law. International uniform law > K3154-3370 Constitutional law > K3370 Constitutional courts and procedure | ||||||
| Divisions: | 03. Fakultas Hukum > Dasar Ilmu Hukum | ||||||
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Contributors: |
|
||||||
| Depositing User: | mrs hoeroestijati beta | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 30 Oct 2017 22:43 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2017 22:43 | ||||||
| URI: | http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/65202 | ||||||
| Sosial Share: | |||||||
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |