Tiara Kumalasari (2019) Konsep “Antargolongan” Dalam Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Uu Ite). Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

	Text (HALAMAN JUDUL) 1. HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (ABSTRAK) 2. ABSTRAK.pdf Download (370kB)
	Text (BAB 1) 3. BAB I.pdf Download (345kB)
	Text (BAB 2) 4. BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 15 June 2023. Download (421kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB 3) 5. BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 15 June 2023. Download (290kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB 4) 6. BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 15 June 2023. Download (181kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 7. DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (202kB)

Abstract

Factually, Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE) tends to be used to criminalize those who issue opinions in the form of criticism through electronic media because there is an unclear meaning of the concept of "intergroup" in Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law so it causes different interpretations among law enforcement officials. This thesis aims to find clear criteria regarding the concept of "intergroup" contained in Article 28 Paragraph (2) of the ITE Law. The research method used is theoritical research, using statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The conclusion of this thesis is the consideration of judges in several court decisions, both the district court and the high court cannot give a clear meaning of the concept of "intergroup", even the Constitutional Court Decision also tends to expand it. With systematic interpretation, then in finding the criteria of the concept of "intergroup "In Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law may use the term "group" in Article 156 of the Criminal Code.

Actions (login required)

View Item