Rivanda Putra Pratama, .- and Indah Werdiningsih, .- and Ira Puspitasari, .- (2018) Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi di SMP dengan Metode VIKOR dan TOPSIS. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 4 (2). pp. 131-138. ISSN 2443-2555

	Text (Fulltext) C06. Bukti Karya Ilmiah - Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (Penilaian dan Validasi) C06. Review dan Validasi.pdf Download (7MB)

Abstract

This research proposes a solution to create a decision support system of student achievement selection using VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) and Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The decision support system would resolve the problem of big data processing which needs more effort and more time. The development of decision support system of student achievement selection consisted of 6 phases. The first phase was collecting the data and information via interviews and document analysis. The second phase was data processing to create system design. The third phase was analyzing the system that includes the input of student data, weighing the criteria using AHP method, and rank the alternatives using VIKOR and TOPSIS method. The fourth phase was designing the system using Object Oriented Design. The fifth phase was implementing the system using a web-based. The sixth phase was the evaluation of system by comparing the level of accuracy between VIKOR and TOPSIS methods. Based on the result of consistency test, there were 7 inconsistent experiments and 13 consistent experiments. The result obtained is the highest accuracy rate of 80% by using TOPSIS. Based on these results, TOPSIS method can be used in case of selection of outstanding students in SMP Taruna Jaya I Surabaya with degree of importance among the criteria is activity value was slightly more important than report value, activity value was more important than achievement value, activity value was very important from attitude value, report value was slightly more important than achievement value, report value was more important than attitude value, and achievement value was slightly more important than attitude value.

Actions (login required)

View Item