Prisma Agrinda (2012) Lexical Cohesion in The Argumentative Writing of Hearing Impaired Students. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

	Text (HALAMAN JUDUL) 1. HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Download (729kB)
	Text (DAFTAR ISI) 2. DAFTAR ISI.pdf Download (591kB)
	Text (ABSTRAK) 3. ABSTRAK.pdf Download (587kB)
	Text (BAB I) 4. BAB I PENDAHULUAN.pdf Download (612kB)
	Text (BAB II) 5. BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 11 August 2024. Download (622kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB III) 6. BAB III METODOLOGI PENELITIAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 11 August 2024. Download (597kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB IV) 7. BAB IV HASIL DAN ANALISA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 11 August 2024. Download (636kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB V) 8. BAB V KESIMPULAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 11 August 2024. Download (597kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 9. DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (594kB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) 10. LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 11 August 2024. Download (637kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The hearing impaired students tend to have difficulties in performing written composition. This study purposed to analyze lexical cohesion in the argumentative writing of hearing impaired students. The aims of the study are to explore the types of lexical cohesion devices mostly used in the argumentative writing. The writer uses the theory of lexical cohesion frameworks from Halliday and Hasan (1976), Yuwono in Kushartanti et al. (2005) and Djajasudarma (2009) to analyze the data. The method of this study is qualitative descriptive since it is attempted to analyze lexical cohesion of hearing impaired students in their argumentative writing. The participants of the study are 5 students from SMPLB Siswa Budhi in second grade, academic year 2011/2012. The findings show that in the argumentative of hearing impaired students reiteration about 80.9% is mostly used then followed by collocation about 19.1%. Specifically in reiteration, repetition are mostly emerges about 47.1%, antonymy 11.2%, hyponymy 6.7%, synonymy 5.6%, polysemy 4.5%. Additionally, the writer also finds some mistakes in argumentative writing of hearing impaired students especially in language usage. Finally, it can be concluded that the argumentative writing of hearing impaired students still showed the correlation meaning.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Lexical Cohesion, Argumentative Writing, Hearing Impaired Student
Subjects:	P Language and Literature P Language and Literature > PR English literature > PR83 English literature
Divisions:	12. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya > Sastra Inggris
Creators:	Creators NIM Prisma Agrinda NIM120610161
Contributors:	Contribution Name NIDN / NIDK Contributor Masitha A. S NIDN0022127005
Depositing User:	Mrs Nadia Tsaurah
Date Deposited:	18 Aug 2022 08:02
Last Modified:	18 Aug 2022 08:02
URI:	http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/117510
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item