Enita Wardhana (2015) Argumentation in University Debate Competition. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

	Text (HALAMAN JUDUL) 1. HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (DAFTAR ISI) 2. DAFTAR ISI.pdf Download (861kB)
	Text (ABSTRAK) 3. ABSTRAK.pdf Download (668kB)
	Text (BAB I) 4. BAB I PENDAHULUAN.pdf Download (805kB)
	Text (BAB II) 5. BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB III) 6. BA III METODOLOGI PENELITIAN.pdf Download (793kB)
	Text (BAB IV) 7. BAB IV HASIL DAN ANALISA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 21 March 2024. Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB V) 8. BAB V KESIMPULAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 21 March 2024. Download (787kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 9. DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (769kB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) 10. LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 21 March 2024. Download (238kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

There are several occasions where opinion (claims) can be found inside debate, speech, public discussion and any other daily basis. We debate in several occasions such as political debate on TV, High school debate and university debate which use a certain debating system. Development of debate for university level is developed significantly and it proofs when Indonesia becomes the champion of World University Debating Championship (WSDC) in 2014. Argument is the core component in assessing debate because it determines the quality of a debate match. This study aspires to find out the discorse markers used as the linguistic toolsand the features argument during substantive speeches of university debaters and also to figure out flaw of their arguments. The data are taken from the final round (champion and first runner up match) of IVED 2014. Recorded data are transcribed orthographically and finally analyzed bytheoty of discourse marker proposed by Frasser which classified discourse marker into three subclasses namely Contrastive, Elaborative and Inferential markers. The features in layout of argument proposed by Stephen Toulmin is used to figured out Basic components of arguments The result of the study is that university debaters tend to use discourse markers in their argument and used basic features of argument.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Additional Information:	KKB KK-2 FS. BE. 51-15 War a
Uncontrolled Keywords:	DEBATES AND DEBATING
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB5-3640 Theory and practice of education > LB2300-2430 Higher education
Divisions:	12. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya > Sastra Inggris
Creators:	Creators NIM Enita Wardhana NIM121112089
Contributors:	Contribution Name NIDN / NIDK Thesis advisor Viqi Ardaniah NIDN0027038303
Depositing User:	sukartini sukartini
Date Deposited:	26 Nov 2015 12:00
Last Modified:	21 Mar 2022 08:48
URI:	http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/14470
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item