A STUDY OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND L2 LEARNER’S UPTAKE IN ENGLISH GRAMMAR CLASS

Cicilia Deandra Maya Putri, 121211233033 (2016) A STUDY OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND L2 LEARNER’S UPTAKE IN ENGLISH GRAMMAR CLASS. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Airlangga.

[img]
Preview
Text (ABSTRAK)
ABSTRAK.pdf

Download (176kB) | Preview
[img] Text (FULL TEXT)
FS. BE. 104-16 Put s.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
Official URL: http://lib.unair.ac.id

Abstract

This study examines the types of corrective feedback given to L2 learners as well as learners’ uptake in English Grammar classes at English Department of Universitas Airlangga. Using Lyster and Ranta’s (1997) observational scheme, the writer observed and analyzed 425 minutes of transcribed interaction between a lecturer and L2 learners in English Grammar classes. The first finding is that recast was mostly used in the interaction. Recast did not lead to the highest learner’s uptake, but it generated the most learner’s repair in form of incorporation. Repetition was never used. Metalinguistic feedback was the second most used type and led to the highest uptake. In addition, it was considered as the most effective corrective feedback. The other types of feedback followed. Secondly, L2 learners had different responses after being given the feedback, including repair and needs repair. In conclusion, the lecturer used different types of corrective feedback that led to learners’ uptake, moreover, L2 learners found the provision of corrective feedback helpful in making them realize their incorrect utterance and improving their language learning. For further studies, the writer suggests observing longer classroom interaction and conducting certain tests to reveal whether or not learners remember to apply the correct form in further use.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Additional Information: KKB KK-2 FS BE 104-16 Put s
Uncontrolled Keywords: classroom interaction; corrective feedback; English grammar; learner’s uptake; oral activity
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P101-410 Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
Divisions: 12. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya > Sastra Inggris
Creators:
CreatorsNIM
Cicilia Deandra Maya Putri, 121211233033UNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIDN / NIDK
Thesis advisorNoerhayati Ika Putri, M. A.UNSPECIFIED
Depositing User: sukartini sukartini
Date Deposited: 27 Apr 2017 00:44
Last Modified: 27 Apr 2017 00:46
URI: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/56937
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item