Intraurethral lidocaine use during urodynamics in female patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dian Paramita Oktaviani, - and Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi, - and Yudhistira Pradnyan Kloping, - and Furqan Hidayatullah, - and Zakaria Aulia Rahman, - and Soetojo, - (2021) Intraurethral lidocaine use during urodynamics in female patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Turkish Journal of Urology, 47 (5). pp. 366-374. ISSN 21493235

[img] Text (Similarity)
Similarity 2.pdf

Download (2MB)
[img] Text (Artikel)
Artikel 2.pdf

Download (974kB)
[img] Text (Bukti Korespondensi)
Bukti Korespondensi 2.pdf

Download (830kB)
[img] Text (Karil)
Karil 2.pdf

Download (1MB)
Official URL: https://turkishjournalofurology.com/en/intraurethr...

Abstract

Pain and discomfort may occur in catheterization during a urodynamic examination. A lidocaine gel combined with a water-based lubricant is sometimes used to reduce pain during catheterization. Several studies claimed that intraurethral lidocaine administration could cause inaccurate urodynamic parameters results. However, its definite effects in urodynamics testing on humans are still not clear. We aimed to evaluate the effects of intraurethral lidocaine on pain and urodynamic study parameters in patients undergoing an invasive urodynamic examination. A systematic search adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was performed in the MEDLINE, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The bias of the studies is evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool by two independent reviewers. The analyses of continuous outcomes were displayed as mean difference (MD), whereas odds ratio is used to analyze dichotomous data. Heterogeneity between studies is determined using the I2 value. A total of three RCTs out of 622 discovered that articles were eligible for analysis. Forest plot analysis of the mean visual analogue scale difference of the studies indicated an insignificant difference between the lidocaine and placebo group (MD –7.68; 95% CI –34.04 to –18.68, P ¼ .57). All urodynamic parameter results were also similar between the two groups (P > .05). Routine intraurethral lidocaine injection prior to a urodynamic study does not affect pain intensity and urodynamic parameters.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Intraurethral lidocaine, lidocaine, urodynamics, urodynamic study
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC870-923 Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
Divisions: 01. Fakultas Kedokteran > Urologi
Creators:
CreatorsNIM
Dian Paramita Oktaviani, -UNSPECIFIED
Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi, -NIDN0015118007
Yudhistira Pradnyan Kloping, -UNSPECIFIED
Furqan Hidayatullah, -UNSPECIFIED
Zakaria Aulia Rahman, -UNSPECIFIED
Soetojo, -NIDN0008065604
Depositing User: arys fk
Date Deposited: 29 Jan 2023 23:40
Last Modified: 29 Jan 2023 23:40
URI: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/119748
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item