Effectiveness of high-flow inhalation anesthesia technique using insoflurance compared to lo-flow inhalation anesthesia technique using sevoflurance and isoflurance in terms of cost and safety

ArinandaLalita Hayu, - and Elizeus Hanindito, - and Hamzah, - and Arie Utariani, Arie (2019) Effectiveness of high-flow inhalation anesthesia technique using insoflurance compared to lo-flow inhalation anesthesia technique using sevoflurance and isoflurance in terms of cost and safety. Bali Journal of Anesthesiology, 3 (3). pp. 170-173. ISSN 2549-2276

[img] Text (Artikel)
19. Effectiveness of high-flow inhalation anesthesia.pdf

Download (3MB)
[img] Text (Kualitas Karil & Kesesuaian Bidang Ilmu)
(19).pdf

Download (115kB)
[img] Text (Turnitin)
19. Effectiveness of high-flow inhalation anesthesia technique.pdf

Download (1MB)
[img] Text (Laik Etik)
Bukti C.19.pdf

Download (617kB)
Official URL: http://gg.gg/16wsz2

Abstract

Abstract Background: The low-flow technique could reduce the direct and indirect total cost as well as lower the pollution and glasshouse effects. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two inhalation anesthetic agents using low-flow techniques on the hemodynamic changes and cost needed. Subjects and Methods: This is an experimental study with posttest-only control group design and a cost minimization analysis on sixty patients, who had underwent surgery and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were grouped into high-flow isoflurane (HIS), low-flow isoflurane (LIS), and low-flow sevoflurane (LSV) groups. The amount of anesthetic agent used was measured before and after the surgery. The cost needed was the main outcome of this research. Results: There was no significant difference in the hemodynamic changes between these three groups (P > 0.05). There was a significant cost difference between the three groups (P = 0.003). There was no significant cost difference between LIS and LSV groups (P = 0.353). There was a significant difference between the cost of high flow and low flow, but there was no significant difference between the cost of low-flow anesthetic agents. Conclusion: HIS resulted in a more expensive compared to the LIS and LSV. However, there was no significant cost difference between the use of low-flow techniques.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General) > R5-920 Medicine (General)
Divisions: 01. Fakultas Kedokteran > Anestesiologi dan Reanimasi
Creators:
CreatorsNIM
ArinandaLalita Hayu, -UNSPECIFIED
Elizeus Hanindito, -UNSPECIFIED
Hamzah, -UNSPECIFIED
Arie Utariani, ArieNIDN8808130017
Depositing User: arys fk
Date Deposited: 06 Oct 2023 03:05
Last Modified: 23 Oct 2023 00:11
URI: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/128281
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item