WENNY ANZOLA (2024) THE COMPARISON BETWEEN BILINGUAL POCKET ELECTRONIC AND PRINTED DICTIONARIES IN TEXT RECEPTION: A CASE STUDY AT THE STUDENTS 01' SMAN 2SIDOARJO. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

	Text (HALAMAN JUDUL) 1_ HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Download (702kB)
	Text (DAFTAR ISI) 2_ DAFTAR ISI.pdf Download (638kB)
	Text (ABSTRAK) 3_ ABSTRAK.pdf Download (630kB)
	Text (BAB I) 4_ BAB I PENDAHULUAN.pdf Download (759kB)
	Text (BAB II) 5_ BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 22 January 2029. Download (938kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB III) 6_ BAB III METODOLOGI PENELITIAN.pdf Download (698kB)
	Text (BAB IV) 7_ BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 22 January 2029. Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB V) 8_ BAB V KESIMPULAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 22 January 2029. Download (699kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 9_ DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (669kB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) 10_ LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 22 January 2029. Download (754kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study aims to compare between the use of bilingual Pocket Electronic Dictionaries (PEDs) and Printed Dictionaries (PDs) in text reception. The objective of this study is to explain whether, PDs or PEDs, is more effective to assist students in obtain good scores in a reading comprehension test. The theory used in this research is the lexicographical functions theory proposed by Bergenholtz & Tarp (2003). This theory focuses on the user needs. The users in this thesis are the students level XI in $MAN 2 Sidoarjo. The results show that both PEDs and PDs are effective in increasing the scores of the students. From 10 to 20 points however, this study also shows that there are not significant differences between bilingual PEDs and PDs in text reception. Therefore, teachers may encourage the students to use either bilingual PEDs or PDs during English classes, especially when they are discussing reading texts.

Actions (login required)

View Item