NANING SUDIARTI (1999) A STUDY OF THE SPEECH STYLES USED IN COURTROOMS AND THEIR INFLUENCES ON LEGAL DECISION MAKING PROCESSES. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

	Text (HALAMAN JUDUL) 1. HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text (DAFTAR ISI) 2. DAFTAR ISI.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text (ABSTRAK) 3. ABSTRAK.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB I) 4. BABI PENDAHULUAN.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB II) 5. BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA.pdf Download (3MB)
	Text (BAB III) 6. BAB III ANALISA.pdf Download (3MB)
	Text (BAB IV) 7. BAB IV KESIMPULAN.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 8. DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) 9. LAMPIRAN.pdf Download (1MB)

Abstract

Everyone may adopt many kinds of ways of speaking for different circumstances. Yet, he/she cannot hide his/her own original speech style. The way of speaking may reflect the speaker's social background, psychologica1 state and also the influence of speaking context in which he/she involves. Hence, from the speech style he/she used, listener(s) can draw their inferences about what kind of person he/she is, or even his/her personality traits and other mannerisms. A trial process is an unique linguistic phenomenon in which many people present almost similar or different testimonies in many different ways of speech sty1e before the same listeners, in this case the bench of judges. Meanwhile, the testimonies given may be very essential legal evidence from which judges decide legal verdicts. This study is done to investigate what kinds of speech style usually employedy speakers, in this case witnesses and accuseds, to give testimonies. In addition, it is also done to figure out whether difterent kinds of speech style may generate different effects toward listeners in evaluating speakers.

Actions (login required)

View Item