Margaretha Irma Yani Rosa Lumbantoruan (2020) Deconstruction Of Science And Knowledge In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

	Text 1. COVER.pdf Download (665kB)
	Text 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf Download (358kB)
	Text 3. ABSTRACT.pdf Download (145kB)
	Text 4. CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION.pdf Download (286kB)
	Text 5. CHAPTER II - LITERATURE REVIEW.pdf Download (271kB)
	Text 6. CHAPTER III - RESEARCH METHOD.pdf Download (148kB)
	Text 7. CHAPTER IV - RESULT AND DISCUSSION.pdf Download (329kB)
	Text 8. CHAPTER V - CONCLUSION.pdf Download (150kB)
	Text 9. REFERENCES.pdf Download (254kB)
	Text EMBARGO .pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (174kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The realm of science has always developed along with the times and human’s curiosity. Humans will continue to compete for achievements, and this can be done through a scientific approach and the use of knowledge. This research aims to reveal the depiction of science and knowledge that appears in Mary Shelley's Frankensteinnovel using deconstructive criticism. The deconstructive criticism in this study was applied to examine the differance and trace in the text. The findings in this analysis have been done with the following steps. First, the researcher describes the narrative in Frankenstein. Second, the researcher identifies the binary opposition in the text. Third, the researcher shows that Mary Shelley's Frankenstein promotes one of the binary oppositions in the text. Fourth, the researcher explains the inconsistency of the text. Fifth, the researcher finds the ambivalence from the text. Sixth, the researcher finds traces of the multiplicity of meaning, namely the aporia of scientific creation narratives. Through this deconstruction reading, it was found that there are oppositions in the images of science and knowledge, being presented with the mythology, the inconsistency in the science and knowledge depiction, the ambivalence that show both science and knowledge are portrayed as something evocative as well as destructive. This study also found that there are traces of depiction between science and mythology both in the 18th century, 19th until now.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Additional Information:	KKB KK-2 FS BE 70/20 Lum d
Uncontrolled Keywords:	ambivalence, aporia, binary opposition, creation mythology, differance, trace
Subjects:	P Language and Literature
Divisions:	12. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya > Sastra Inggris
Creators:	Creators NIM Margaretha Irma Yani Rosa Lumbantoruan NIM121611233079
Contributors:	Contribution Name NIDN / NIDK Thesis advisor Rina Saraswati NIDN0018057804
Depositing User:	mrs siti muzaroh
Date Deposited:	21 Dec 2020 10:48
Last Modified:	21 Dec 2020 10:48
URI:	http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/101797
Sosial Share:

Actions (login required)

View Item